LOGISTICS EDI CONNECTION

Connect to States Logistics Warehouse EDI with EDIXT

States Logistics Warehouse Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

This page uses the current EDIXT rollout profile for States Logistics Warehouse, covering X12 204, 214, 856, 810 for rollout planning, validation, and downstream handoff before partner-specific exceptions are added.

Logistics Partner layer
US Coverage
5 flows Message scope
Logistics the United States X12 204, 214, 856, 810
Book a Demo Back to Partners
Partner overview

How to use this partner profile

States Logistics Warehouse is currently mapped as a logistics partner in the United States. The current EDIXT Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) profile for this route is built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, because those messages usually define the first operational checkpoints teams need to stabilise.

Use this profile to plan transport over AS2, SFTP, and API, validation checkpoints, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, ERP, and Reporting while partner-specific identifiers, exceptions, and timing rules are being confirmed.

EDIXT is currently using the logistics rollout profile for States Logistics Warehouse, based on transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice. Confirm the final document mix, identifiers, transport rules, and timing windows during onboarding.
EDI capabilities

Transactions and message scope

Below is the current Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) document profile used to plan connectivity for States Logistics Warehouse, based on the document mix teams usually need first in this logistics workflow.

204

Transaction set 204

Partner-specific transaction flow managed through EDIXT validation and routing.

214

Transaction set 214

Partner-specific transaction flow managed through EDIXT validation and routing.

856

Advance ship notice

Shipment structure and carton detail passed into warehouse, carrier, and customer systems.

810

Invoice

Structured billing data passed to finance and reconciliation workflows.

997

Functional acknowledgement

Technical acknowledgement proving that a partner message was received and parsed.

Onboarding flow

Typical rollout sequence for States Logistics Warehouse

A typical Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) rollout starts by teams agreeing how to define the operational handoff and ends with the controls needed to surface exceptions early.

1

Define the operational handoff

Agree the shipment, warehouse, status, and billing events each side needs to exchange.

2

Validate carrier and warehouse references

Check shipment IDs, warehouse codes, route references, and timestamps before anything lands downstream.

3

Route events into operations systems

Push validated data into transport, warehouse, ERP, and visibility tools with one controlled mapping layer.

4

Surface exceptions early

Keep failed events and partner message gaps visible to operations teams before service levels slip.

Validation focus

Common issues teams need to catch early

The main Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) risk areas for States Logistics Warehouse usually show up around shipment reference drift and warehouse status timing gaps.

Shipment reference drift

Transport updates become hard to action when shipment IDs, booking numbers, or route references are inconsistent.

Warehouse status timing gaps

Late status events can break downstream visibility and customer promise dates.

Billing disconnected from movement data

Freight or logistics invoices are harder to reconcile when movement and status data are not aligned.

Related partners

Similar partner profiles worth reviewing

These links surface nearby logistics profiles that are useful when you need to compare document coverage, operating region, or rollout pattern before mapping this relationship. 271 comparable pages are currently live in this category.

American Freight Furniture Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

American Freight Furniture Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

Celadon Logistics Services Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

Celadon Logistics Services Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

Concourse Team Express Llc Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

Concourse Team Express Llc Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

Northland Fulfillment Inc. Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

Northland Fulfillment Inc. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

Old Dominion Freight Lines Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

Old Dominion Freight Lines Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

ProPack Logistics Services Logistics | the United States | 0 transaction sets

ProPack Logistics Services Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) logistics profile built around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, advance ship notice, and invoice, transport design, and downstream handoff into Warehouse management, Transport systems, and ERP.

Related resources

Implementation paths and supporting pages

Use these pages to compare similar workflows, choose downstream integrations, and move from partner research into practical rollout planning for States Logistics Warehouse.

Logistics Automation

Connect warehouses, 3PLs, carriers, and shipment events without manual chasing.

Connect with Trading Partners

Connect retailers, distributors, marketplaces, and logistics partners through one operating layer.

ERP Integrations

Connect ERP platforms to partner documents and downstream operational workflows.

Back to the full partner directory

Browse other partner profiles when you need a second workflow example or a nearby operational comparison.

Logistics hub

Compare similar logistics profiles, document mixes, and rollout patterns in the same category.

Integrations directory

Review the downstream ERP, warehouse, commerce, and finance endpoints that usually connect to this workflow.

Logistics Automation

Connect warehouses, 3PLs, carriers, and shipment events without manual chasing.

FAQ

Questions teams often ask before they connect States Logistics Warehouse

These answers cover the document mix, transport methods, validation checks, and downstream handoff patterns currently used to plan connectivity for States Logistics Warehouse.

What transaction scope is usually relevant for States Logistics Warehouse?

States Logistics Warehouse is currently profiled around transaction set 204, transaction set 214, and advance ship notice, which gives teams the practical document scope to map, validate, acknowledge, and route into live operations.

Is this based on exact partner coverage or a common rollout pattern?

This profile is based on the current EDIXT rollout pattern for States Logistics Warehouse, using the logistics message mix and downstream handoff patterns teams most often need first.

Which systems usually need to receive States Logistics Warehouse data?

For this profile, the downstream handoff usually touches Warehouse management, Transport systems, ERP, and Reporting, so the integration design needs to keep both partner rules and internal system constraints in view.

Next step

Turn this partner profile into a live rollout plan

Use this profile to confirm the document scope, transport rules, validation ownership, and downstream routing needed for States Logistics Warehouse, then move the rollout into mapping, testing, and cutover.

Book a demo Browse logistics
Document scope X12 204, 214, 856, 810
Transport AS2 / SFTP / API
Landing systems Warehouse management / Transport systems / ERP